Switch to ADA Accessible Theme
Close Menu
San Diego Employment Lawyer / Blog / Unpaid Wages / The Independent Contractor Test: Are You Misclassifying Your Freelancers?

The Independent Contractor Test: Are You Misclassifying Your Freelancers?

Wages_Money

Most businesses in 2026 are still playing a dangerous game of “guess and check” with their workforce. They hire a graphic designer, a software dev, or a marketing consultant, slap an “Independent Contractor” label on the contract, and assume they’ve successfully dodged the overhead of payroll taxes, workers’ comp, and health insurance.

They’re wrong. In the eyes of the law, labels are legally irrelevant. You can have a signed, notarized 50-page agreement calling someone a freelancer, but if their daily reality looks like an employee’s, the state will treat them as one.

At In Motion Law, we see the fallout of these “paper-only” classifications every day.

The ABC Test: California’s Rigid Reality

If you operate in California, you are likely governed by the “ABC Test,” codified under Assembly Bill 5 (AB5). This isn’t a “balancing test” where you can fail one part and make it up on another. To legally classify a worker as a contractor, the hiring entity must prove all three of the following:

  • (A) Control: The worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract and in actual practice.
  • (B) Core Business: The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.
  • (C) Independent Trade: The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.

If you miss even one of these prongs, you aren’t just facing a tax headache. You are looking at significant liability for unpaid overtime, missed meal and rest breaks, and unreimbursed business expenses. When a worker realizes they’ve been denied the benefits they’re entitled to, their first call is often to a San Diego unpaid wages lawyer.

The Freelancer Protection Act (FWPA)

As of 2025, California added another layer of complexity with the Freelance Worker Protection Act (SB 988). This law requires written contracts for any freelance work valued at $250 or more and mandates payment within 30 days of completion.

What many employers fail to realize is that the FWPA creates a “double-edged sword.” By complying with the FWPA’s contract requirements, you are creating a permanent digital paper trail of the working relationship. If that relationship doesn’t pass the ABC Test, those very contracts, designed for compliance, become Exhibit A in a misclassification lawsuit.

At In Motion Law, we help employers navigate this paradox, ensuring their freelance agreements don’t inadvertently become confessions of an employment relationship.

Worried About Being Sued for Misclassifying a Freelancer?

Misclassification isn’t just an “accounting error.” It’s a liability time bomb. If you’re using contractors to perform the core functions of your business, you are effectively self-insuring against a massive legal judgment.

At In Motion Law, we provide the strategic audits and aggressive defense necessary to protect your company from the predatory litigation environment that defines the 2026 market.

If you are unsure whether your current contractor roster would survive a challenge in court, don’t wait for a demand letter to arrive. Contact In Motion Law today to schedule a comprehensive classification audit.

We represent employers throughout San Diego, Orange, and Riverside counties, providing the sophisticated legal counsel needed to keep your business moving forward. Let’s clean up your contracts before the state does it for you. Call at 619-693-8336 today.

Source:

leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB988

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
MileMark

© 2025 - 2026 In Motion Law. All rights reserved.
This law firm website and legal marketing are managed by MileMark.